3039 were a factor of 100 too large. So the values for
should read 2.1/0.5 rather than 210/50 and the coalescence time 
should be 0.87 rather than
87.Correction of a few typos in Table 1.
(Click on the red icon to view the context)
|
All the timescales for J07373039 were a factor of 100 too large. So the values for
should read 2.1/0.5 rather than 210/50 and the coalescence time should be 0.87 rather than
87. |
 |
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2005-7 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |