

5.2 Motion of an electric
charge
5.2.1
Dynamics of a
point electric charge
A point particle carries an electric charge
and moves on a world line
described by
relations
, in which
is an arbitrary
parameter. The particle generates a vector potential
and an electromagnetic field
. The dynamics of the entire system is
governed by the action
where
is an action functional for a free
electromagnetic field in a spacetime with metric
,
is the action of a free
particle moving on a world line
in this spacetime, and
is an interaction term that couples the field to the
particle.
The field action is given by
where the integration is over all of spacetime. The particle action
is
where
is the bare mass of the particle and
is the differential of
proper time along the world line; we use an overdot to indicate
differentiation with respect to the parameter
. Finally, the interaction term is given by
Notice that both
and
are invariant under a reparameterization
of the world line.
Demanding that the total action be stationary
under a variation
of the vector potential
yields Maxwell’s equations
with a current density
defined by
These equations determine the electromagnetic field
, once the motion of the electric charge is
specified. On the other hand, demanding that the total action be
stationary under a variation
of the world
line yields the equations of motion for the electric charge,
We have adopted
as the parameter on the world line, and
introduced the four-velocity
.
The electromagnetic field
is invariant under a gauge transformation of the
form
, in which
is an arbitrary scalar function. This function can
always be chosen so that the vector potential satisfies the Lorenz
gauge condition,
Under this condition the Maxwell equations of Equation (437) reduce to a wave
equation for the vector potential,
where
is the wave operator and
is the Ricci tensor. Having adopted
as the parameter on the world line, we can re-express the current
density of Equation (438) as
and we shall use Equations (441) and (442) to determine the
electromagnetic field of a point electric charge. The motion of the
particle is in principle determined by Equation (439), but because the
vector potential obtained from Equation (441) is singular on the
world line, these equations have only formal validity. Before we
can make sense of them we will have to analyze the field’s
singularity structure near the world line. The calculations to be
carried out parallel closely those presented in Section 5.1 for the case of a scalar
charge; the details will therefore be kept to a minimum and the
reader is referred to Section 5.1 for additional information.
5.2.2
Retarded potential
near the world line
The retarded solution to Equation (441) is
, where
is the
retarded Green’s function introduced in Section 4.4. After substitution of
Equation (442) we obtain
in which
gives the description of the world line
and
. Because the retarded
Green’s function is defined globally in the entire spacetime,
Equation (443) applies to any field
point
.
We now specialize Equation (443) to a point
close to the world line. We let
be the normal convex neighbourhood of this point,
and we assume that the world line traverses
(refer back to Figure 9). As in
Section 5.1.2 we let
and
be the values of the
proper-time parameter at which
enters and leaves
, respectively. Then Equation (443) can be expressed
as
The third integration vanishes because
is then in the past of
, and
. For the second integration,
is the normal convex neighbourhood of
, and the retarded Green’s function can be expressed
in the Hadamard form produced in Section 4.4.2. This gives
and to evaluate this we let
be the retarded point associated with
; these points are related by
and
is the retarded distance
between
and the world line. To perform the first integration
we change variables from
to
, noticing that
increases as
passes through
; the integral evaluates to
. The second integration is cut off at
by the step function, and we obtain our final
expression for the vector potential of a point electric charge:
This expression applies to a point
sufficiently close to
the world line that there exists a nonempty intersection between
and
.
5.2.3
Electromagnetic
field in retarded coordinates
When we differentiate the vector potential of
Equation (444) we must keep in mind
that a variation in
induces a variation in
, because the new points
and
must also be linked by a null geodesic. Taking this
into account, we find that the gradient of the vector potential is
given by
where the “tail integral” is defined by
The second form of the definition, in which we integrate the
gradient of the retarded Green’s function from
to
to
avoid the singular behaviour of the retarded Green’s function at
, is equivalent to the first form.
We shall now expand
in powers of
, and express the result in
terms of the retarded coordinates
introduced
in Section 3.3. It will be convenient to
decompose the electromagnetic field in the tetrad
that is obtained by parallel transport of
on the null geodesic that links
to
; this construction is
detailed in Section 3.3.
Note that throughout this section we set
, where
is the rotation tensor
defined by Equation (138): The tetrad vectors
are taken to be Fermi-Walker transported on
. We recall from Equation (141) that the parallel
propagator can be expressed as
. The expansion relies on Equation (166) for
, Equation (168) for
, and we shall need
which follows from Equation (323) and the relation
first encountered in
Equation (144). We shall also need
the expansions
and
that follow from Equations (323, 324, 325). And finally, we
shall need
a relation that was first established in Equation (327).
Collecting all these results gives
where
are the frame components of the tail integral; this is obtained
from Equation (446) evaluated at
:
It should be emphasized that in Equations (451) and (452), all frame components
are evaluated at the retarded point
associated
with
; for example,
. It is clear from these equations that the
electromagnetic field
is singular on the world
line.
5.2.4
Electromagnetic
field in Fermi normal coordinates
We now wish to express the electromagnetic
field in the Fermi normal coordinates of Section 3.2; as before those will be
denoted
. The translation will be carried out as
in Section 5.1.4, and we will decompose the
field in the tetrad
that is obtained by parallel
transport of
on the spacelike geodesic
that links
to the simultaneous point
.
Our first task is to decompose
in the tetrad
, thereby
defining
and
. For this purpose we use
Equations (224, 225) and (451, 452) to obtain
and
where all frame components are still evaluated at
, except for
which are evaluated at
.
We must still translate these results into the
Fermi normal coordinates
. For this we involve
Equations (221, 222, 223), and we recycle some
computations that were first carried out in Section 5.1.4. After some algebra, we
arrive at
where all frame components are now evaluated at
; for example,
.
Our next task is to compute the averages of
and
over
, a two-surface
of constant
and
. These are defined by
where
is the element of surface area on
, and
. Using the methods developed
in Section 5.1.4, we find
The averaged field is singular on the world line, but we
nevertheless take the formal limit
of the
expressions displayed in Equations (458) and (459). In the limit the
tetrad
becomes
, and we can
easily reconstruct the field at
from its frame components.
We thus obtain
where the tail term can be copied from Equation (454),
The tensors appearing in Equation (460) all refer to
, which now stands for an arbitrary point on the
world line
.
5.2.5
Singular and
radiative fields
The singular vector potential
is the (unphysical) solution to Equations (441) and (442) that is obtained by
adopting the singular Green’s function of Equation (335) instead of the
retarded Green’s function. We will see that the singular field
reproduces the singular behaviour of the retarded
solution, and that the difference,
,
is smooth on the world line.
To evaluate the integral of Equation (462) we assume once more
that
is sufficiently close to
that the world line
traverses
(refer back to Figure 9). As before we let
and
be the values of the
proper-time parameter at which
enters and leaves
, respectively. Then Equation (462) becomes
The first integration vanishes because
is then in the chronological future of
, and
by
Equation (338). Similarly, the third
integration vanishes because
is then in the chronological
past of
. For the second integration,
is the normal convex neighbourhood of
, the singular Green’s function can be expressed in
the Hadamard form of Equation (344), and we have
To evaluate these we let
and
be the retarded and advanced points associated with
, respectively. To perform the first integration we
change variables from
to
, noticing that
increases as
passes through
; the integral evaluates to
. We do the same for the second integration, but we
notice now that
decreases as
passes through
; the integral evaluates to
, where
is
the advanced distance between
and the world line. The third
integration is restricted to the interval
by the step function, and we obtain the
expression
for the singular vector potential.
Differentiation of Equation (463) yields
and we would like to express this as an expansion in powers of
. For this we will rely on results already established
in Section 5.2.3, as well as additional
expansions that will involve the advanced point
. We recall that a relation between retarded and
advanced times was worked out in Equation (229), that an expression
for the advanced distance was displayed in Equation (230), and that
Equations (231) and (232) give expansions for
and
, respectively.
To derive an expansion for
we follow the general method of Section 3.4.4 and introduce the functions
. We have that
where overdots indicate differentiation with
respect to
, and
. The
leading term
was worked out in
Equation (447), and the derivatives
of
are given by
and
according to Equations (449) and (325). Combining these
results together with Equation (229) for
gives
which should be compared with Equation (447). It should be
emphasized that in Equation (465) and all equations
below, all frame components are evaluated at the retarded point
, and not at the advanced point. The preceding
computation gives us also an expansion for
which becomes
and which should be compared with Equation (449).
We proceed similarly to derive an expansion for
. Here we introduce the functions
and express
as
. The leading term
was computed in Equation (448), and
follows from Equation (324). Combining these
results together with Equation (229) for
gives
and this should be compared with Equation (448). The last expansion
we shall need is
which follows at once from Equation (450).
It is now a straightforward (but still tedious)
matter to substitute these expansions into Equation (464) to obtain the
projections of the singular electromagnetic field
in the same tetrad
that was employed in Section 5.2.3.
This gives
in which all frame components are evaluated at the retarded point
. Comparison of these expressions with
Equations (451) and (452) reveals that the
retarded and singular fields share the same singularity structure.
The difference between the retarded field of
Equations (451, 452) and the singular
field of Equations (469, 470) defines the radiative
field
. Its tetrad components are
and we see that
is a smooth tensor field on the world
line. There is therefore no obstacle in evaluating the radiative
field directly at
, where the tetrad
becomes
.
Reconstructing the field at
from its frame components,
we obtain
where the tail term can be copied from Equation (454),
The tensors appearing in Equation (473) all refer to the
retarded point
, which now stands for an
arbitrary point on the world line
.
5.2.6
Equations of
motion
The retarded field
of a point
electric charge is singular on the world line, and this behaviour
makes it difficult to understand how the field is supposed to act
on the particle and exert a force. The field’s singularity
structure was analyzed in Sections 5.2.3
and 5.2.4, and in Section 5.2.5
it was shown to originate from the singular field
; the radiative field
was then shown to be smooth on the world line.
To make sense of the retarded field’s action on
the particle we follow the discussion of Section 5.1.6 and temporarily picture the
electric charge as a spherical hollow shell; the shell’s radius is
in Fermi normal coordinates, and it is independent
of the angles contained in the unit vector
. The net force acting
at proper time
on this shell is proportional to the
average of
over the shell’s surface.
This was worked out at the end of Section 5.2.4,
and ignoring terms that disappear in the limit
, we obtain
where
is formally a divergent quantity and
is the tail part of the force; all tensors in Equation (475) are evaluated at an
arbitrary point
on the world line.
Substituting Equations (475) and (477) into
Equation (439) gives rise to the
equations of motion for the electric charge
with
denoting the (also formally divergent) bare mass of
the particle. We see that
and
combine in Equation (478) to form the
particle’s observed mass
, which is finite and gives a
true measure of the particle’s inertia. All diverging quantities
have thus disappeared into the procedure of mass renormalization.
Apart from the term proportional to
, the averaged force of Equation (475) has exactly the same
form as the force that arises from the radiative field of
Equation (473), which we express
as
The force acting on the point particle can therefore be thought of
as originating from the (smooth) radiative field, while the
singular field simply contributes to the particle’s inertia. After
mass renormalization, Equation (478) is equivalent to the
statement
where we have dropped the superfluous label “obs” on the particle’s
observed mass.
For the final expression of the equations of
motion we follow the discussion of Section 5.1.6 and allow an external force
to act on the particle, and we replace, on the
right-hand side of the equations, the acceleration vector by
. This produces
in which
denotes the observed inertial mass of
the electric charge and all tensors are evaluated at
, the current position of the particle on the world
line; the primed indices in the tail integral refer to the point
, which represents a prior position. We recall that
the integration must be cut short at
to avoid the singular behaviour of the retarded Green’s function at
coincidence; this procedure was justified at the beginning of
Section 5.2.3. Equation (481) was first derived
(without the Ricci-tensor term) by Bryce S. DeWitt and Robert
W. Brehme in 1960 [24
], and then corrected
by J.M. Hobbs in 1968 [29]. An alternative
derivation was produced by Theodore C. Quinn and Robert
M. Wald in 1997 [49
]. In a subsequent
publication [50
], Quinn and Wald
proved that the total work done by the electromagnetic self-force
matches the energy radiated away by the particle.

