| 1 | The situation is even more puzzling in the
Einstein-Yang-Mills theory where the right side of
Equation (1 ) acquires an additional
term, . In treatments based on
stationary space-times, not only the Yang-Mills charge ,
but also the potential (the analog of and ,
is evaluated at infinity [175]. |
|
| 2 | However, Condition (6 ) may be too strong in some problems, e.g., in the
construction of quasi-equilibrium initial data sets, where the notion of WIH is more
useful [124 ]
(see Section 5.2). |
|
| 3 | Indeed, the situation is similar for black holes in equilibrium. While it is physically reasonable to restrict oneself to IHs, most results require only the WIH boundary conditions. The distinction can be important in certain applications, e.g., in finding boundary conditions on the quasi-equilibrium initial data at inner horizons. | |
| 4 | Note that we could replace with because . Thus the cosmological constant plays no role in
this section. |
|
| 5 | This formula has a different sign from that given
in [85 ]
due to a difference in the sign convention in
the definition of the extrinsic
curvature. |
|
| 6 | Cook’s boundary condition on the conformal
factor
(Equation (82) in [72 ]) is equivalent
to which (in the co-rotating case, or more generally, when the
2-metric on is axi-symmetric) reduces
to
on . The Yo et al. boundary
condition on (Equation (48) of [190]) is equivalent
to
on , where, however, the
evolution vector field is obtained by a superposition of two Kerr-Schild
data. |
|
| 7 | We are grateful to Alejandro Corichi for correspondence on the recent results in this area. |