3423/3424

From Mathsoc wiki

Outline of Riemann Mapping Theorem

Just learn the bold points for a minimal outline.

  • Reduce to case \Omega is bounded, using fact \Omega is not all of \mathbb{C}

As \Omega \neq \mathbb{C} \exists b \in \mathbb{C}, b \not \in \Omega, so g(z) = z-b \neq 0 on \Omega, so there is a square root h(z)^2 = g(z), injective as g. We can show there is z_0 such that B_\delta(z_0) \subset h(\Omega) but B_\delta(-z_0) \not \subset h(\Omega), let H(z) = 1/(h(z) +z_0), then H(\Omega) is bounded (by 1/\delta).

  • Create a family \mathcal{F} of injective maps taking a\in \Omega to 0

Consider \Omega bounded, let \mathcal{F} = \lbrace f: \Omega \rightarrow \Delta | f(a) = 0, f injective \rbrace. Let A = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} |f^\prime(a)|, there exists a sequence f_n such that |f_n^\prime(a)| \rightarrow A, obviously |f_n|\leq 1 so f_n uniformly bounded, so...

  • Apply Montel's theorem to find a compactly convergent subsequence in \mathcal{F} converging to f with the maximum possible |f^\prime(a)|

... Montel's theorem implies there is a compactly convergent subsequence f_{n_k} tending to f such that |f^\prime(a)| = A.

  • Show f is injective (using Rouche's theorem)

Assume f not injective, let z_1 \neq z_2 but f(z_1) = f(z_2) = w, let h(z) = f(z) - w, h_{n_k}(z) = f_{n_k}(z) - f_{n_k}(z_2). Look at a disc \Delta_\varepsilon(z_1) not containing z_2, suppose h is non-zero on boundary of disc and note can choose k so that |h_k(z) - h(z)| < \delta = \min_{\Delta_\varepsilon(z_1)} |h| (by uniform convergence of h_k to h), Rouche then implies h_k(z)=0 in disc, injectivity of f_k then says z_2 in disc, contradiction.

  • Show f is surjective, by supposing not and then constructing a function F \in\mathcal{F} satisfying |F^\prime(a)| > |f^\prime(a)|

If no surjective, can find b \in \Delta not in image of f. Consider g(z) = \varphi_b \circ f, non-zero on \Omega so has a square root h, let h(a) = c, consider F(z) = \varphi_c \circ h, sends a to zero and is injective, an explicit calculation shows |F^\prime(a)|>|f^\prime(a)|, a contradiction.