3423/3424

From Mathsoc wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 13:26, 3 June 2012
Elhoward (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Elhoward (Talk | contribs)

Line 33: Line 33:
If no surjective, can find <math>b \in \Delta</math> not in image of <math>f</math>. Consider <math>g(z) = \varphi_b \circ f</math>, non-zero on <math>\Omega</math> so has a square root <math>h</math>, let <math>h(a) = c</math>, consider <math>F(z) = \varphi_c \circ h</math>, sends <math>a</math> to zero and is injective, an explicit calculation shows <math>|F^\prime(a)|>|f^\prime(a)|</math>, a contradiction. If no surjective, can find <math>b \in \Delta</math> not in image of <math>f</math>. Consider <math>g(z) = \varphi_b \circ f</math>, non-zero on <math>\Omega</math> so has a square root <math>h</math>, let <math>h(a) = c</math>, consider <math>F(z) = \varphi_c \circ h</math>, sends <math>a</math> to zero and is injective, an explicit calculation shows <math>|F^\prime(a)|>|f^\prime(a)|</math>, a contradiction.
- 
- 
-===Resources=== 

Current revision

This page is far from complete! Can you help by adding anything to it (such as notes or links to useful sites)?

3423/3424: Complex Analysis I/II

Lecturer: Dr. Dmitri Zaitsev

Website: Link


Contents

Introduction

The course

The course focuses around several main theorems, both proof (given below) and applications. There is on average four assignments between both semesters. The exam is worth a 100% of the course.

The subject

Theorems

Outline of Riemann Mapping Theorem

Just learn the bold points for a minimal outline.

  • Reduce to case \Omega is bounded, using fact \Omega is not all of \mathbb{C}

As \Omega \neq \mathbb{C} \exists b \in \mathbb{C}, b \not \in \Omega, so g(z) = z-b \neq 0 on \Omega, so there is a square root h(z)^2 = g(z), injective as g. We can show there is z_0 such that B_\delta(z_0) \subset h(\Omega) but B_\delta(-z_0) \not \subset h(\Omega), let H(z) = 1/(h(z) +z_0), then H(\Omega) is bounded (by 1/\delta).

  • Create a family \mathcal{F} of injective maps taking a\in \Omega to 0

Consider \Omega bounded, let \mathcal{F} = \lbrace f: \Omega \rightarrow \Delta | f(a) = 0, f injective \rbrace. Let A = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} |f^\prime(a)|, there exists a sequence f_n such that |f_n^\prime(a)| \rightarrow A, obviously |f_n|\leq 1 so f_n uniformly bounded, so...

  • Apply Montel's theorem to find a compactly convergent subsequence in \mathcal{F} converging to f with the maximum possible |f^\prime(a)|

... Montel's theorem implies there is a compactly convergent subsequence f_{n_k} tending to f such that |f^\prime(a)| = A.

  • Show f is injective (using Rouche's theorem)

Assume f not injective, let z_1 \neq z_2 but f(z_1) = f(z_2) = w, let h(z) = f(z) - w, h_{n_k}(z) = f_{n_k}(z) - f_{n_k}(z_2). Look at a disc \Delta_\varepsilon(z_1) not containing z_2, suppose h is non-zero on boundary of disc and note can choose k so that |h_k(z) - h(z)| < \delta = \min_{\Delta_\varepsilon(z_1)} |h| (by uniform convergence of h_k to h), Rouche then implies h_k(z)=0 in disc, injectivity of f_k then says z_2 in disc, contradiction.

  • Show f is surjective, by supposing not and then constructing a function F \in\mathcal{F} satisfying |F^\prime(a)| > |f^\prime(a)|

If no surjective, can find b \in \Delta not in image of f. Consider g(z) = \varphi_b \circ f, non-zero on \Omega so has a square root h, let h(a) = c, consider F(z) = \varphi_c \circ h, sends a to zero and is injective, an explicit calculation shows |F^\prime(a)|>|f^\prime(a)|, a contradiction.